Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Books

Blog powered by Typepad
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

« When Is the News Media Going to Catch On? | Main

11 June 2022

Comments

Pat Speer

I think Roe makes a good case for the bullet not being switched. I think the article is hampered, however, by its assertion as fact that "This bullet, after penetrating the president’s upper back and exiting his throat, traversed Texas Governor John Connally’s torso and wrist before lodging itself superficially in his left thigh. During the chaos at Parkland Hospital, the bullet fell out onto the stretcher cart being used to transport Connally to the operating room." As he well knows, there are many reasons to doubt this happened. While he may not doubt this happened, the article would be far more effective, IMO, if it stuck to the chain-of-custody issue, and did not present such speculation as fact.

Brian Doyle

Parnell [sic] and Roe forgot to mention that the Parkland Hospital personnel who found the bullet made clear it was a pointed-tip round and not the round-tipped copper-jacketed bullet seen in evidence.
Typical of Parnell [sic], he also forgets to mention that FBI agent Odum disavowed what was attributed to him in the report and told researchers he never handled the bullet.
While this is interesting it doesn't prove that the timing issue isn't evidence of a swapped-in bullet. Todd's initials are not proof that it wasn't swapped-in before that.

Antoni Wrega

Who believes Oliver Stone's fantasy movies? Well, hard-working people who simply do not have time to read such articles like this one by Steve Roe. This is it.

BillTracy17

Just to clarify, although I agree with the article and see it as a fine piece of work, I am not a co-author.

W. Tracy Parnell

Lawrence P. Schnapf

Steve Roe occasionally comes up with good finds and I acknowledge them when he does. This article is a mixed bag. It does to bed the issue of Todd's initials but is flawed when it comes to the timeline. Steve presumes an innocent explanation without any evidence or corroborating testimony as to why Frazier said he received the bullet 80 minutes later.

This is yet another example of how Steve uses different levels of scrutiny when assessing evidence supporting the official theory as opposed to evidence supporting a conspiracy. He is eager to dismiss any inconsistencies with the official record as a harmless error but employs an exacting level of scrutiny for evidence supporting a conspiracy. This suggests a bias in his analysis and not a true pursuit of the truth. I wish he could view evidence through a lens that is not colored towards a particular view.

Steve Roe

In response to Lawrence Schnapf:

Thanks for acknowledging Elmer Todd's initials on CE399. I'm sure researcher John Hunt did his best to find them, but sadly he passed away before the NIST images were made available.

Regarding the timing issue you put forth, there is no issue. Per the article, Robert Frazier simply noted on his "Warren Commission Testimony Worksheet" the 7:30 PM notation. This is not, and let me repeat, this is not the time he received CE399 at the FBI Lab from Todd. This has been badly misinterpreted. As the article states, you can see Frazier, Killionm and Cunningham's initials on the envelope that had the staple marks that Johnsen's White House letter was attached to. Frazier simply used the 7:30 time off that letter. It's as simple as that. There was no sinister timing issue.
Your statement that "I should view evidence that is not colored towards a particular view" is ludicrous and unfounded. I point to your own participation in this Oliver Stone film. I could call that bias, as one-sided as the film was, but out of respect I will not put that label on you.
The bigger issue now is whether Oliver Stone will acknowledge this egregious error. I hope you would agree with me that Mr. Stone and Mr. DiEugenio should issue a correction or statement in this regard if they have any concern at all about the truth.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Washington Decoded